Singing Potatoes
Thursday, 1 December 2005
Denied!
Grumpy

Well, I'm working this weekend. So much for firing cannons, singing shanties and hanging out with the guys.

On the bright side, I'll make some extra money for — no, wait, I don't get overtime any more. Aren't I lucky?


Posted by godfrey (link) — 4 comments
Sunday, 4 December 2005
Funny thing happened to me today...
got hash?

So I was getting lunch at a sub shop, and the girl behind the counter smiled and said slyly, "I like your shirt."

I said "Thanks," and took a quick look to see what I was wearing -- it was my "got hash?" T-shirt. Heh.

"Well, it disgusts me," said the middle-aged woman next to me, waiting for her sandwich. "You ought to be ashamed of yourself."

"What do you mean?" I asked, though I had a pretty good idea.

"I don't approve of drug users," she snapped.

"Neither do I," I said. "This shirt is from Hash, Incorporated, which makes 3D computer animation software. It's named after its founder, Martin Hash."

She turned red. "Well, how was I supposed to know that?" she asked.

"I don't know," I said. "But maybe you shouldn't be automatically assuming the worst of people you don't even know."

She turned away and didn't speak again until she got her sandwich. After she left, the girl behind the counter asked, "Is that true about what your shirt means?"

"Yes," I said.

"Oh," she said, a little disappointed. "Well, it's still a cool shirt."


Posted by godfrey (link) — 4 comments
Where are the frickin' laser beams?

Cool, found another Webcomic to read: Evil, Inc. Lisa, you might enjoy this particular storyline, which visits their graphic design department.

Posted by godfrey (link) — 2 comments
Monday, 5 December 2005
The Flower of Battle

Here's a Web site which has (well, eventually will have) translations of all three known versions of Fiore de' Liberi's Flos Duellatorum or Fior di Battaglia.

The Pierpoint-Morgan version is pretty much useless — the few parts which actually exist in that manual are "under translation" — but the Getty version really brings back some memories.

Posted by godfrey (link)
Tuesday, 6 December 2005
System hosed. System repaired.
Stupid plastic piece of crap!

Today I tried upgrading my Linux desktop environment, as I noticed that a brand-new version was out. Long story short, I have the stable version of Debian Linux, and KDE 3.5 apparently depends on some libraries only available in the unstable version1, so things didn't work out too well2. It took me about an hour to rip KDE out by the roots and replace the original version.

But on the positive side, I did the entire thing — upgrade, removal and reinstallation — without rebooting,3 and once I got the original version of KDE reinstalled, my desktop was exactly the way I'd left it. The more I use Linux, the more I like it.4 If only my three favorite Windows apps had Linux versions...


1. Which would have been nice to know before I tried it.

2. Which is to say, it entirely uninstalled KDE and all applications associated with it, installed a few of its new libraries and then barfed because some of them had files already contained in other packages, and once I'd forced it to overwrite the duplicate files (nothing important, just icons and images), then it finally realized it didn't have the right library versions and refused to install any further. And it wouldn't install the original version back again, because the bits which had been installed had higher version numbers. So I had to go find those bits and remove them before I could go back to what I had.

3. Which is fortunate, because I've been too lazy to put my network drive mappings into /etc/fstab, so it would have been a pain to try to remember what they all were. I'll probably get around to doing that now. Probably.

4. Despite problems like this, which, to be fair, would have been avoided had I just waited for the new version of KDE to show up when I did an update in apt-get or kpackage.


Posted by godfrey (link) — 2 comments
Monday, 12 December 2005
Weird.
Dalek

Bought myself a new toy, a Linksys NSLU2. Ostensibly, this is a network-attached storage device: plug one or two USB hard drives into it, stick it on your router or switch, and you can access the drives from anywhere on your network. Under the cover, it's a 266 MHz Intel network processor (underclocked to 133 MHz by an easily removed resistor) running a variant of Linux in firmware. And it can be flashed with a couple of different replacement Linux kernels to make it capable of doing more than just serving files on a network (for example, you can turn it into a Web server that fits in the palm of your hand).

One of the things I'd like to do with this is to turn it into a picture storage device for our trip to England next year: hook up a USB memstick reader and a hard drive, and every time I fill up a memstick from the digital camera, just stuff it in the reader and the NSLU2 will move the files off of it and onto the hard drive. Should be a piece of cake to do once I've got a less restricted version of Linux running on it; and since I already have all the components, it'll certainly be cheaper than buying enough memsticks to last a week in England.

I figured I'd just try out its basic functions before reflashing the firmware, just to make sure it wasn't defective. Since I didn't want to clean off any of my external hard drives yet, I figured I'd try it with a 512 MB flash drive. The NSLU2 won't format flash drives, so I plugged the drive into my Linux box, partitioned it and formatted it in the required fashion, stuck a test file on it, and plugged it into the NSLU2. Browsed to it from my XP box, and... no file. Tried again from the Linux box. No file. Okay. So I copied a file onto it from my XP box, and I could see it from the Linux box. Strange.

So I powered down the NSLU2, put the flash drive on my Linux box (since XP can't read EXT3 filesystems), and... found the test file I'd put on there before moving it to the NSLU2 in the first place. The file I'd put on from the XP box was nowhere to be found. Moved the flash drive back to the NSLU2, and there was the file from the XP box, but not the test file from the Linux box.

What the hell?


Posted by godfrey (link) — 5 comments
Friday, 16 December 2005
Lowering standards: Children

Years ago, I used to see bumper stickers praising the drivers' children's academic excellence.

My child is on the Honor Roll
at Goiter Elementary

But I guess that was too exclusionary; perhaps the parents of children not quite as academically inclined complained too much, because then these started appearing:

My child is a Good Student
at Elephantiasis High

But then there came the push to make grades meaningless — for apparently a child's self-esteem is far more important than actually learning anything in school which will help them get a good job in the real world — so those made way for:

My child is a Good Citizen
at Chlamydia Middle School

But apparently that's no good anymore, as the other day I saw:

My child is a Terrific Kid
at Carotenosis Elementary

Well, I'm sure that will satisfy most parents — I've seen vast numbers of children behaving monstrously in stores and restaurants, whose parents react as though they're just doing the most adorable things ever — but somewhere there'll be a parent who can't deny that his or her little brat isn't really "terrific", and will sue to get a sticker he or she can display too. So let's go with one that includes all children: good students, bad students, good citizens, troublemakers, athletes, stoners, A/V geeks and so forth.

My child is a Carbon-Based
Life Form at Epididimitis High

Whoops, we can't use that one — it sounds too scientific, which of course means evolution! Why, this nation's 80% minority of Christians might feel oppressed by it. Better go with something safer, like:

My child attends
Phlebitis Elementary

Except that's bad for two reasons: first, it advertises to those people who prey on children where potential victims can be found, and it excludes home-schooling parents, and the parents of dropouts. So let's just go with:

I have one or more children

Perfect! It excludes nobody except for childfree couples — but they benefit from them too: they can count the bumper stickers as they drive through a restaurant parking lot and mentally prepare themselves for the dining experience awaiting them inside.

Everybody wins!

Posted by godfrey (link) — 2 comments
If it weren't for bad luck...
Grumpy

This week has been a much-needed vacation for me. Karen and I were planning to go places, do things, and have a lot of fun.

Naturally, I started getting sick on Tuesday evening, and have felt progressively worse every day since.


Posted by godfrey (link)
Tuesday, 20 December 2005
Stuck in the Panhandle

Well, I'm spending the week in a hotel in Crestview, a development I was informed of yesterday when I got in to work. While I was on vacation, two technicians quit and a third had to go into the hospital. I'm covering the latter's territory while he recovers from surgery.

Well, at least I've got plenty of books, and my laptop plays DVDs.

Posted by godfrey (link) — 1 comment
Wednesday, 28 December 2005
Blast from the past

In Walton County, Florida, convicts on work detail wear the old-fashioned horizontal black-and-white striped prison uniforms, right down to the little pillbox hats. Seeing them, I felt like I had stepped into a Keystone Kops or Three Stooges movie.

Posted by godfrey (link)
Humbuggery

Thank goodness that ridiculous "War on Christmas" nonsense is over for another year. Italians, Spaniards, Frenchmen and Germans are so lucky they don't have to suffer through the "Keep Christ in Christmas" crap, what with their Buon Natale, Feliz Navidad, Joyeux Noël and Fröhliche Weihnachten.

It struck me yesterday that the whole hullaballoo seems like something Screwtape or Anthony Crowley would have dreamed up: get Christians so trapped in the bunker mentality, concentrating so hard on defending themselves against "secularists", that they forget all about that whole "peace on Earth, good will towards Men" message which used to be the focus of Christmas. I didn't see a single church signboard with that scriptural quote this year, though I saw plenty of "Keep Christ in Christmas" and "Christ is still welcome here" signs.

And I look at those self-appointed generals who lead this "war" — such as Bill O'Reilly and John Gibson, whose doorsteps have seemingly never been darkened by such purportedly "Christian" virtues as humility, forgiveness and charity — and wonder how they've managed to pass themselves off as champions of a religion whose tenets they so blatantly and consistently ignore.

Ah, well. At least it's over for another ten months or so.

Posted by godfrey (link) — 1 comment
Thursday, 29 December 2005
Why Veritas Sucks, part LXVII

I hate the Veritas tape backup program for a multitude of reasons. Today, I had a server not make a backup; this was the error message in the event log:

The Backup Exec Job Engine service depends on the Backup Exec Server service which failed to start because of the following error: The operation completed successfully.

It's not quite as amusing as the "An undetectable error has occurred" message I got from Windows 3.1 once, but it ranks up there.

Posted by godfrey (link)
Attack of the Robospammers
Faces of Insanity

Certain entries in this blog of mine attract the spam like crazy. Last night, I shut off comments on the most recent target; since then, twenty-six twenty-seven separate attempts have been made to add comments to it. Every instance involves two hits, from two very different IP addresses, with no repeats; the second one attempts to post the comment.

It looks like there's something out there — a trojan or something similar — that places a victim's computer under the control of the spammers. It looks like the first hit is an attempt to ascertain that the page actually exists, and the second one is the actual comment posting. It's fiendishly clever — since they come from a wide variety of addresses, you can't simply block an IP address (or range of addresses); and since many of them come from big ISPs (comcast, adelphia, ameritech, roadrunner, etc.), blocking their address ranges would block many potential readers.

Looks like I'm going to have to rework the comment code to prevent this.


Posted by godfrey (link)