Could somebody explain to me why, with all the expanded powers ceded to law enforcement by the USA-PATRIOT act which Ashcroft is traveling the country trying desperately to defend, he was adamant that the FBI be denied the right to see if suspected terrorists have purchased guns?
With privacy-killing provisions like "sneak and peek", which gives police the right to search your home without your knowledge, or forcing librarians to turn over patrons' reading lists, or greatly loosened wiretapping regulations, what is so sacrosanct about whether or not someone's bought a killing device?
And why don't I remember reading about this in the Tribune?