Singing Potatoes
Tuesday, 5 November 2002
Happy Guy Fawkes Day!

I'm not sure whether it's optimism or mean-spiritedness that makes me wish that ballots listed the candidates in alphabetical order, with no indication of the party to which they belong.

The optimist in me says, "Perhaps that would spur people to actually research the candidates' positions and voting histories, rather than simply voting along party lines."

To which the mean-spirited bastard responds, "Oh, come off it. You know they'd just write down a list of their party's candidates and take it into the booth with them. But I agree; if people are so lazy that the last actual political decision they make concerns which party to join, voting should be made as difficult as possible. And quite frankly, if voters are too stupid to understand the ballots, to hell with them."

Of course, now that we (at least here in Flori-duh) have shiny new computerized voting machines, it would be theoretically possible to enable more informed voting. Any time a candidate with a political history is on the ballot, his or her name could be accompanied by a button that pops up a complete listing of the candidate's voting record, financial statements, campaign promises (and how many were actually kept), etc. (That'll never happen, of course, because incumbent politicians desperately depend on an uninformed voting public with a tragically short memory.)

Mr. Optimism would also like to see Presidents refrain from campaigning for others while they're in office. They're supposed to be leading the entire nation justly, not taking time away from their office to promote their own cronies. It was despicable when Clinton did it, and it's despicable when Bush is doing it.

Mr. Mean-Spirited Bastard replies: "What are you, a complete moron? Presidents, singers, movie stars... politicians need these people to convince the public to vote for them, because the pathetic sheep are more swayed by celebrity than by reason."

Ah, well. It doesn't really matter. There's less and less difference between the Democrats and the Republicans — they're both full of power-hungry opportunists who serve themselves first, their parties second, and the people last (if at all) — and the third parties will never become viable enough to make a lasting impact.

Parting words from Mr. Optimist: "Well, at least we won't have to suffer through any more political ads for a while!"

Posted by godfrey (link)
Comments
Politicians remind me of the those popular kids in High School. You know the ones, right? They were the same two-faced, sidewinding, self-important egomaniacs that belonged to every extracurricular activity, and who had to be in every single yearbook picture. The kids that chaired the local SADD chapter and got weasel-sick drunk every Friday and Saturday night.

In the long run, I take great comfort in the fact that even though many of these slick, self-righteous, power-mad potentates can lie, cheat and steal better than anyone else, many of them come up short in the intellectual and moral department (providing their children a trust fund of moral bankruptcy), and politics, being the mean-spirited cannibal that it is, will almost certainly devour any semblance of normalcy, privacy and ultimately, identity, that they might ever know.

Not that I have any issues with polticians.
I've had an idea that I think is good, and would be good for elections. They could make a list of platform issues, and have candidates choose their positions on them, multiple choice style. Then they could present the same list to the voters, and they could choose their positions on said issues, and the computer would then place a vote for the candidate whose views most closely match the voters. Then, since you weren't voting for the person but the issues, we wouldn't have to see all the posturing of the talking heads, and all the celebrity boosting. Then, after the election, the list of most popular issues would be published, and the politicians held liable to stick to the issues they claimed they support.

Nah, that'd never work. It would never work for TV.
Dangerous idea there, Lunchbox. It would move this country closer to being an actual democracy (rather than the republic that it's been since its inception).

Now, if we had a national telephone/computer network like France has, with everyone given a basic terminal in their homes, we could actually be a true democracy; the people could be the ones to decide each issue themselves, rather than electing representatives to decide them. There'd be no need for political parties, Congress, the President... just the citizenry collectively voting on the issues, and civil servants hired to implement them.

Of course, that will never come to pass either; the politicians would never give up their trough.