Singing Potatoes
Friday, 27 August 2010
Another one for the massive "To Do" List
Ha! Ha!

Had a thought last night for a musical video: "The Twelve Days of Magic", where each verse mentions a specific magical illusion, demonstrated in the video as it's sung.

For my first magic lesson, the conjurer taught me... the Olram Subtlety.
...two French drops...
...Three-Card Monte...
...four Elmsley Counts...
...five linked rings!

And so forth. I think I need a different one for the first lesson, though; it doesn't scan perfectly, and I would really have to haul ass to get the move done in about six seconds. Time to pull out "Counts, Cuts, Moves & Subtlety"...


Posted by godfrey (link) — Comment
Wednesday, 3 February 2010
More non-standard Web standards
Stupid plastic piece of crap!

Firefox, Safari and Google Chrome support the <audio> tag; Internet Explorer, Opera and Konqueror do not.

Of the ones that do support it, Firefox and Chrome will play Ogg Vorbis files but not MP3s; Safari will play MP3s but not Ogg Vorbises (Oggs Vorbis?). All three of them have a simple mute button, but no volume slider.

Posted by godfrey (link) — Comment
Wednesday, 20 January 2010
Okay, so let me get this straight.
I\'m wishing ass cancer on you!

So, let me see if I've got this right. Because Ted Kennedy's seat was won by a Republican, reducing the Democrats' lead in the Senate to a mere eighteen vote majority, they're caving completely and scuttling the healthcare reform that was already gutted to the point where it lay to the right of Nixon's proposed reforms?

Not like they actually used their "supermajority" anyway; they squandered it like the Republicans squandered the former budget surplus. If you ask me, neither party is fit to govern this country.


Posted by godfrey (link) — Comment
Tuesday, 12 January 2010
I am so sorry

The recent New Jersey same-sex marriage decision, and the Proposition 8 hearings, are making me feel a bit guilty.

Karen and I chose not to have children, so the government never should have permitted us to marry. After all, the whole purpose of marriage is procreation, or so I have read many times over the last few years - and letting people marry without procreating somehow irrevocably damages the sanctity of marriage. Had I realized this at the time, obviously I would never have chosen to harm the sanctity of other people's marriages by marrying a woman with whom I did not intend to produce offspring.

I see now that my decision to marry her out of love and a desire to spend the rest of my life with her was a selfish act, and I heartily apologize to everyone whose marriages I have weakened thereby.

Posted by godfrey (link) — Comment
Monday, 11 January 2010
Another year, another set of resolutions to break.
Ha! Ha! I am on the Intarweb!

This year, I resolve to:

  • Start working on a webcomic, now that I have finally disposed of my last excuse to not do so. Even if nobody reads it. And I will take heart from the fact that 95% of all webcomics looked like utter crap when they started out, and not be discouraged because my art isn't as good as Jeph Jacques' or Lar de Souza's. When they started out... neither was theirs.
  • Practice the rackett, every day if possible. I wanted one for years, and now that I've purchased one, I've been really horrible about practicing it. That will stop. Once Karen's received her PhD and we relocate again, I want to be able to find an early music group to play in, and have an awesome instrument in my arsenal... but it won't do me any good if I can't play it well.
  • Quit restricting myself to 140-character Twitter and Facebook posts. If I have something to say, I'll say it. Even if I don't think anyone will read it, or even if it might piss off people who can't tolerate anyone who thinks differently. Left, right, fundamentalist, militant atheist - I'll probably piss SOMEONE off. Too bad.
  • Finish large projects before agreeing to take on new ones.
  • Be more punctual with household chores.

I suppose the whole list can be summed up with one resolution: Quit being so goddamned lame.


Posted by godfrey (link) — 1 comment
Friday, 9 October 2009
Some type of SNAFU.
Stupid plastic piece of crap!

Twelve years after I first created them, I'm getting ready to release updated versions of my 'historic' fonts. A lot of new font technology has arisen since they were first released, and I'm taking advantage of some nifty features of Unicode and OpenType to make them much easier to use (at least in applications which support those features, like InDesign, or Firefox 3.5).

And there's the rub - out of eight browsers that I've tried, only Firefox supports the OpenType features like contextual alternates and ligatures that are built into the fonts - and then, only on Windows (not on Linux).

Also disappointing is the inconsistent support for the CSS3 @font-face tag, which allows a browser to download and use a font that's not installed on the system.

BrowserDownloadOpenType
Firefox 3.5 (Windows)YESYES
Firefox 3.0 (Windows)NOYES
Firefox 3.5 (Linux)YESNO
Safari 4.0.3 (Windows)YESNO
Opera 10 (Windows/Linux)YESNO
Google Chrome (Windows)YES*NO
Internet Explorer 8 (Windows)YES**NO
Firefox 3.0 (Linux)NONO

* Google Chrome can use @font-face, but only if the --enable-remote-fonts command-line switch is used.

** Internet Explorer 8 does not support does support downloading of TrueTupe or OpenType format fonts with @font-face - just their own, formerly proprietary EOT format. While it is possible to convert TrueType/OpenType fonts to EOT format, this requires maintaining twice the number of font files in order to support IE8 users.

The exciting thing about Firefox 3.5's support is that anyone browsing a page using my fonts will automatically see them as intended, archaic letters and ligatures and all, even without the fonts installed on their system. Anyone else will just see the fonts without the archaic characters and ligatures, at best; at worst, just their default fallback fonts.

Add to that the fact that there's currently no way to turn the various typographical features on or off via CSS, and it looks like it'll be a little while before the Web world can compete with InDesign for proper, more-or-less automatic representation of historical documents.


Posted by godfrey (link) — Comment
Sunday, 4 October 2009
Vancouver is out of ideas too
It Stinks!

Wrote this in response to an email from someone who wanted to know what I thought about the current Stargate franchise. Might as well post it here too, since I've done very little with it in the last few months. Warning: contains spoilers.


Having now watched the Stargate: Universe pilot, I'll have to say that the new show must be pretty good for the environment, because it contains a high percentage of recycled material:

  • Nerdy kid wins video game, which turns out to have been a recruitment tool, and as a result of his brilliance, he ends up going into space: The Last Starfighter.
  • A team of civilians and military personnel go through a stargate, end up further from Earth than anyone's ever been before, in a habitat built by the Ancients which has fallen into disrepair and is low on power; they are unable to return to Earth: Stargate: Atlantis.
  • The main characters are living in a habitat which continues to move further and further from Earth; they cannot change its course, and are attempting to survive on limited resources. Frequently, though, they come within range of a habitable planet, which they have a limited time to explore and obtain necessary materials (and, I would imagine, interact with the inhabitants) before their "home" moves out of range for them to return: Space: 1999.
  • Hand-held, shaky camera work and dim lighting. An egotistical, stubbled scientist with apparent ulterior motives, who feels free to ignore the dictates handed down by the military hierarchy. Heralded in promotional material as "dark and gritty", with "flawed and unprepared characters" who blur the line between good and evil: the Battlestar Galactica remake.

So they don't seem to be pioneering very far onto untrodden ground with the new show's overall concept.

As to the pilot episode itself: for an hour and a half of running time, it didn't really feel like they covered a whole lot of ground, plot-wise. There really wasn't much differentiation between most of the characters (especially the military men, and all the women who aren't the senator's daughter). But it was a pilot episode, and those do tend to give short shrift to characterization in lieu of setting the scene and simply introducing the characters to the audience, so I'll give it a few more episodes to improve in that area.

I was quite annoyed by the "air leaking out of the shuttlecraft" subplot. By an astounding coincidence, they managed to arrive just hours before the leaking air became a fatal problem. When they couldn't close the stuck doorway, they didn't even attempt to block it off (crates, plastic sheeting duct-taped around the sides, etc). Though The Last Starfighter kept looking back over his shoulder at the floating camera as he stood near the stuck doorway, it didn't occur to him to use it to press the controls in the shuttlecraft to close the door (I would have been satisfied if they had at least tried it and discovered that the control panel would only react to the touch of a living organism). And although they showed that the ship was clever enough to seal the doors leading to sections leaking air, when the shuttle airlock door didn't close, it wasn't clever enough to seal the next doors closest to the stuck one? All in all, it was a pretty artless way to force the plot to a point where the senator sacrificed himself for the good of everyone else.

So... not impressed with the current state of the franchise. Like I said, I won't write it off just yet - I'll give it a chance to improve - but I was not terribly thrilled by the pilot.

(But if Gordie MacScientist starts hallucinating his dead wife à la Number Six, I'm shutting it off right then and there.)


Posted by godfrey (link) — Comment
Wednesday, 23 September 2009
Shenanigans
Sir Henry Lee disapproveth of thy shenanigans
Posted by godfrey (link) — 1 comment
Monday, 1 June 2009
Irony Watch
I\'m wishing ass cancer on you!

It seems to me that the main difference between the people cheering for the murder of Dr. George Tiller, and the pro-choice advocates they hate, is the age of the life they consider acceptable for termination.

(This isn't a slam at pro-choice advocates, but a comment on the hypocrisy of the people gloating about his death.)


Posted by godfrey (link)