Singing Potatoes
Thursday, 30 June 2005
iEnvy
Ha! Ha! I am on the Intarweb!

I have to admit, I really like the look of the modern Mac GUI. Not that that's much of an admission, given the Playskool-like design of the default Windows XP interface. The OSX Tiger "Brushed Metal" look is especially nifty.

But I'm not about to give up the PC world just because the interface looks like ass. At the rate I go through hardware upgrades, I'd put myself in the poorhouse if I Switched; hooray for open standards which drive the price down through competition. Not to mention I'd have to spend at least a couple thousand dollars to buy the Mac equivalents of the commercial software I use (although I use freeware whenever possible, sometimes it just doesn't measure up to the pricey stuff).

But... with the right software, the XP interface can be made to look a bit better:

Click for half of the full desktop
Click for the whole thing. Well, half of it, at any rate.

Ahhh. Much better, though after years of the taskbar being at the bottom, having it at the top is kind of disconcerting. Though that's where it was in OS/2, so I should be able to get used to it again.

Ha, which reminds me of a funny story. Once upon a time, back at my previous place of employment, I replaced some of the graphic resources in my Windows 9x machine's system files to make it look as much like OS/2 Warp 4 as I could, and replaced the boot screen with the Warp one. The computer had to go in for service — it was randomly crashing, even when sitting idle, and it was (as far as I could tell) free of viruses and other nasties. The technician didn't even try to diagnose the problem, as "You've got some weird hybrid of Windows and OS/2 on there, and I have no idea where to even start with it." The kicker is that he tried to charge us for service he didn't even attempt to perform. But if there's one thing I can say about my old boss, it's that he was more tenacious than a pit bull when it came to money, so we didn't have to pay for it.


Posted by godfrey (link)
Comments
:-P A sack of [poo] in a suit is still a sack of [poo]...

Can't remember the actual idiom.

Take heart, now that Apple is Intel-ing, you'll just have to wait 'til some kid hacks it so it'll run on AMD...
Hey now, it's much less like [poo] than it used to be. XP hardly ever crashes on my main desktop machine.

From what I've been reading, it looks like Apple's still going to go with proprietary hardware, without which the OS won't run. I tend to doubt it'll be hackable to work on a vanilla Intel PC. (It's not like they actually want to gain market share or anything.)

It's not so much market share, as the fact that Apple is a hardware company; and if they allowed it to run on a beige box, why would anyone buy their hardware?

I'm curious to see how they'll lock the OS to the machine. By all accounts, the Intel developer box is a generic Intel strapped inside a G5 case.
Arrrgh. I read about the hardware thing on a link associated with this article, but unfortunately they don't archive the "links of the week" along with the articles. Though that article does lightly touch upon it.

But is Apple really just a hardware company?

Cringley's full of it, if you ask me. Which you didn't.
As a daily Mac user, I can tell you that OSX is not that easy to work with, eventhough it looks nice on the screen. Things pop up and rotate instead of just a darn useful pull down menu. As both a Mac user (designer in the real world) and a PC owner (artist in my own mind), the two are getting a lot closer than ever before. I can almost do everything I do at work at home, except the graphics capacity on the Mac still have an edge - but the $$$ of the PC is less. Believe me, you are not missing a lot.
Squelch: Well, he certainly has some ... interesting ideas sometimes.

Lisa: What video card and how much RAM do you have installed in your machine?