Scientology claims to possess the only workable mental health technology. These pages, however, show the pathetic mental state to which Scientology drove one of its members. This site is not affiliated with the Church of Scientology.

[email only -- not posted to newsgroups]

At 10:56 PM 5/29/96 +1:00, Koos Nolst Trenite wrote:
>
>(The evidence of the removal of Miscavige is very heavily suppressed.
> Yet the fact that there are no
> "Miscavige-is-the-great-Emperor-of-Scientology-shows"
> anymore, and that his photo is not shown anymore
> in Scn-magazines as "the Emperor", and lately not shown at all,
> point at least to what I stated about his removal.

Would you like me to mail you a copy of the latest Clearwater edition of Freedom? It has numerous pictures of Miscavige lording it over the Hubbard Birthday Bash celebration at Flag.

>The other point you mention is difficult.
> Some people post to nag and make wrong only.

Perhaps -- but by attacking them, rather than answering them, you give the impression to other people (especially new readers) that your statements cannot be defended by any rational means, and therefore your arguments become less believable.

If you lack the time to answer them properly, it would probably be better to make no response at all, than to make one which casts you in a bad light.

>If it is hard to support the reality of what I say,
> then in later Bulletins I try to present more data
> in order to bring about more understanding of
> what I said or claimed earlier.

You do understand, I suspect, that many people (including myself) do not believe in reincarnation, or in communicating with the dead, which makes it very difficult to believe anything that you say comes from LRH (or from telepathic auditing). I've no wish to offend you, but it does make it difficult to take anything you say at face value.

>After having explained the circumstances under
> which I am working,
> I do appreciate the validity of your suggestions for
> improvement, and hope that I have, with this
> reply, made a slight step in the right direction.

I appreciate that you've taken the time to answer me, as you have in the past when I requested information about the meanings of the abbreviations you use (such as LFBD, F/N, etc.), though there have also been times when you've ignored my questions.

>Any more suggestions are most welcome, as
> they might arise in the future.

That was pretty much the best advice I could give: if your communication shows a reality closer to that of the people you're communicating with, they're less likely to dismiss you as insane. I don't remember Hubbard's definition of insanity off the top of my head, but here in the wog world, "insanity" is often the label given to people who seem to be experiencing a reality which is incompatible with the one everyone else experiences.

>As your suggestions certainly would also be made
> by others, I take the liberty and opportunity to send
> a copy of my reply to a.r.s. as well.

Well, I must admit that I was not terribly happy to see private email sent to a public forum without my knowledge or permission.

But that's a part of netiquette that didn't make it into RI-533i.