Dear Jeff,
Thanks very much for your care.
The points you mention - while not easy to satisfy - are well taken.
(The evidence of the removal of Miscavige is very heavily suppressed.
Yet the fact that there are no
"Miscavige-is-the-great-Emperor-of-Scientology-shows"
anymore, and that his photo is not shown anymore
in Scn-magazines as "the Emperor", and lately not shown at all,
point at least to what I stated about his removal.
Also, there has been a deliberate PR-campaign
by OSA anonymous posters, some time ago,
to put me there as insane in this matter.
Only recently OSA-criminals posted while
pretending to be "Lavenda Van Schaick", in order
to try and drive readers insane, which is the only
way criminals can think of "handling" unpleasant
witnesses.
If these readers want to follow OSA-advice,
that is their good right, but I believe I have done more
than my best to point out the fallacy and immorality of these
criminal OSA-actions.
I did even write RI-533i "Netiquette", to indicate the purpose
of the psychotics of OSA.)
If some declare me insane, so be it. I am therefore
not going to withhold or revoke what I personally know.
The other point you mention is difficult.
Some people post to nag and make wrong only.
The desire to answer them is not quite encouraged
by such posts, and on top of that there is the lack
of time available, as I am working, and have been
working in the last two years, more or less day and night.
So even if I wanted to answer, there was the issue
of where to put my time. And that still is very much an issue.
Quite an amount of RI-Bulletins have to be brought up to date,
and a much larger stack is waiting to still be issued
and hasn't even been typed and edited yet.
I like to answer you now and take the time for it,
because it is obvious that you care for others
and for my doing better, which I very much appreciate.
Still I could not promise to you that I will also
take that time for others.
I put a considerable amount of time into trying
to make the RI-Bulletins as readable as possible
also for those that are not familiar with the
terminology and with the actions involved and
the individuals mentioned.
In this way I hope to somewhat make up for the
lack of replies which you point out.
If it is hard to support the reality of what I say,
then in later Bulletins I try to present more data
in order to bring about more understanding of
what I said or claimed earlier.
After having explained the circumstances under
which I am working,
I do appreciate the validity of your suggestions for
improvement, and hope that I have, with this
reply, made a slight step in the right direction.
Any more suggestions are most welcome, as
they might arise in the future.
As your suggestions certainly would also be made
by others, I take the liberty and opportunity to send
a copy of my reply to a.r.s. as well.
with kind regards to you,
Koos
Koos Nolst Trenite - Ambassador for Mankind
Copyright 1996 by Koos Nolst Trenite
(inclusion of my previous email deleted)